Authorized: Official U.S. SodaSlim shop|1 capsule a day · 30 capsules · 30 days a bottle|658 mg a capsule · 138 mg of caffeine|+1 (302) 200-3480|Lot SOD-26/SO-6271
SodaslimroutineOfficial U.S. shop

About Sodaslimroutine

A retailer that publishes what it found, including the parts that do not help sell anything.

Quick answer

Sodaslimroutine is the official U.S. SodaSlim shop operating from 500 Park Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10022, with returns handled at 400 Park Avenue, Floor 10, New York, NY 10022. We are not the manufacturer; the label says distributed by Gex Corporation LLP, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404. We earn a commission on orders placed through this site. Our editorial rules are that the printed label beats every other source, that nothing is invented, and that anything missing is printed as missing.

Who we are

Sodaslimroutine is a retail and review desk for one product. We take orders, we publish what the label says, and we say what we think of it.

We are not the manufacturer and we do not pretend otherwise. The label reads distributed by Gex Corporation LLP, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404, as printed on the label, with the telephone number +1 507 448 8190 and the address [email protected]. No manufacturer is named on the pack at all.

Our office is 500 Park Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10022. Returns are handled at 400 Park Avenue, Floor 10, New York, NY 10022. The order desk is +1 (302) 200-3480 and this website's own address is [email protected].

Those are the only addresses and numbers connected with this site. We have not invented an extra street, a laboratory, a licence or a head office to look larger than we are.

The five rules we write by

The printed label wins. Where the label and the brief disagree, the label is right and the disagreement gets printed. There are seven such conflicts on this product and they are all listed on the home page.

Never invent a fact. No price, no doctor, no laboratory, no testimonial, no study and no PubMed ID that we cannot point at. Anything we do not have is printed as not published.

Only cite what we opened. Every source in our reference list is a page we read. Where a source reports its own weaknesses, we quote those too.

Never write FDA approved. No supplement is. We write made in an FDA-registered facility, and then we explain what that means.

Publish the criticism on the same page as the buy button. Not in a footer, not behind a link. The first substantive section of our home page is about the phrase on the front of the bottle.

Why a retailer would do this

Because the alternative is a page that agrees with everything and is therefore worth nothing. A reader who can see us criticise the product we sell has some reason to believe the rest.

How we make money, stated plainly

Orders placed through the buy buttons on this site earn this site a commission. That is the whole of our funding model and there is nothing hidden about it.

It creates an obvious incentive to be positive, and the honest way to handle an incentive is to disclose it and then act against it where the evidence requires.

So: this site scores the product it sells 2.8 out of 5, and the highest-scoring rows are both about the label rather than the formula. It publishes ten things the label does not tell you. It refuses to print a star rating because the one we were given is marked as layout copy. It opens its home page with the caffeine.

None of that is good for conversion. All of it is on the site.

A Joint Glide bottle, front label

We are a retailer for one product and a review desk for the same one. That is a conflict of interest, we state it on five pages, and the way we handle it is to publish everything we found — including a chart showing that the garcinia in this capsule delivers a fifteenth of the dose the studies used.

Where our sources disagree with each other

ConflictWhat we did
Roasted beans on a green coffee productThe brand's own ingredient image set contains a photograph of <b>dark roasted coffee beans</b> alongside one of green unroasted beans. The panel declares <i>green coffee bean extract</i>, and the entire premise of green coffee extract is that the beans are unroasted — roasting is what degrades the chlorogenic acids the extract is standardised to. A picture of roasted beans is not a picture of what is in this capsule. The panel governs, and the panel says green.
A doctor-formulated badge and no doctorThe listing carries a doctor-formulated mark. The only clinician image in the whole pack is a stock photograph of a man in a white coat pointing at the bottle, with no name, no institution and no credential anywhere near it. We have published it captioned as a stock photograph rather than invent a formulator.
The bonuses claim what the label does notThe label's four claims are metabolic and appetite support, craving control and satiety, energy production from fat, and healthy weight management — all ordinary structure and function wording. The five bonus e-books supplied with the pack are called <i>10-Day Metabolic Challenge</i>, <i>Accelerated Metabolism</i>, <i>Facial Rejuvenation</i>, <i>Renova Flora Protocol</i> and <i>Personalized Usage Guide</i>. A ten-day timeframe, an acceleration and a facial outcome are three promises the regulated part of this product never makes.
Logos standing in for citationsThe pack contains a bar of four logos: the International Journal of Obesity, Nature, The Boston Globe and the American Physiological Society. No paper, author, date, title or finding is attached to any of them. A journal logo is not a citation and a newspaper logo is not a finding. We have published the bar and said what it does and does not establish.
138 milligrams, and then someThe panel prints 138 mg of caffeine anhydrous and bounds the green tea extract at under 3% caffeine, which is at most 3.9 mg. It says nothing at all about the caffeine in 130 mg of green coffee bean extract. So the label gives you a precise figure and an unquantified addition to it, and a buyer counting toward the FDA's 400 mg a day cannot close the sum.
The same desk, under two namesThis product's label gives <i>Gex Corporation LLP, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404, +1 (507) 448-8190, [email protected]</i>. Another product this desk wrote up yesterday gave a different company in a different state — and the identical telephone number and the identical email address. The two packs also share the same five bonus e-book covers, the same bar of journal logos and the same lifestyle photographs. We are stating what is printed; we are not inferring a corporate structure from it.
Four numbers that match, and five ingredients that do notGreen coffee 130 mg, raspberry ketone 130 mg, garcinia 130 mg, green tea 130 mg. Their studied doses are nothing like one another: garcinia's is measured in grams of HCA, green coffee's in low hundreds of milligrams of extract, raspberry ketone's does not exist. A round number repeated four times is chosen for the formula rather than derived from the research.

What nobody published about this product

  • How much caffeine the green coffee bean extract contributes. It is standardised to chlorogenic acids, which says nothing about caffeine, and nothing on the label decaffeinates it. So 138 mg is a floor rather than a total.
  • A street address. The label gives a PO Box for Gex Corporation LLP, and 21 CFR 101.5 asks for street, city, State and ZIP unless the firm is listed in a current directory.
  • A dose to compare the raspberry ketone against. The NIH says it has been studied only in combination with other ingredients, so 130 mg cannot be set beside anything.
  • Why four ingredients are at exactly 130 mg. Their studied doses are nothing like each other, so a repeated round number is a formulation choice rather than a derived one.
  • Any statement about taking it with food, or about not taking it late in the day. On a capsule carrying 138 mg of caffeine, the second one would be worth printing.
  • Any interaction statement. NCCIH notes garcinia may interact with medications affecting the liver and serotonin, and caffeine has its own list. The caution panel's advice to consult a physician is doing all of that work.
  • The name of the doctor behind the doctor-formulated badge. No clinician is named anywhere, and the only clinician image in the pack is an unnamed stock photograph.
  • Any price. Pack prices are whatever the info page shows at checkout.
  • Any test report or laboratory name behind certificate reference SOD-6271-26-SO, and any expiry date.
  • Any verified customer reviews. The material we were given contains a review block that its own source note marks as layout copy.

Who writes this

Corrections

If anything on this site is wrong, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did. Write to [email protected], Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET. That address handles pages, typos, privacy and press; it cannot see orders, and for anything about an order the desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 is the number that works.

About Sodaslimroutine: common questions

Who is selling it on this site?

Sodaslimroutine, described in the brief as the official U.S. SodaSlim shop. We are a retailer for this product and a review desk for the same product, we earn a commission on orders placed here, and we say so on five pages including this one.

Who makes it?

The label says <i>distributed for</i> Gex Corporation LLP, PO Box 12730, Ogden, UT 84404, with a telephone number and [email protected]. No manufacturing facility is named. 21 CFR 101.5 asks for a street address, city, State and ZIP unless the firm is listed in a current city or telephone directory, and a PO Box is not a street address.

Do you make money if I buy?

Yes. Orders placed through the buttons on this site earn this site a commission. That is the whole funding model, and it is why an editorial score of 2.8 out of 5, a section on roasted beans in a green coffee product and a chart showing a fifteen-fold dose gap are all published here rather than quietly left out.

Why did you score it 2.8 out of 5?

Because the label is the best-built one on this desk and the formula behind it is mostly under-dosed. Panel completeness and standardisation both score 4.5. Dose against research scores 1.5, because 65 mg of HCA against 1,000 to 2,800 mg is the dominant fact about this product. Stimulant disclosure scores 2.0, because 138 mg is printed and the green coffee's caffeine is not. Price clarity and buyer feedback score as they do on every product here.

Why are there no customer reviews on this site?

Because the material we were given marks its own review block as layout copy. Its exact words: reviews, star scores and order counts in this pack are layout copy only. It contains a 4.4-star score, 732 written reviews, 6,294 orders and eight named buyers. Publishing any of that as feedback would mean inventing customers, so we publish none of it and say why.

Which number or address do I use?

+1 (302) 200-3480 for anything about an order: tracking, changes, refunds. [email protected] for anything about this website: pages, typos, privacy, press, Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET. The website address cannot see your order. The label also prints the distributor's number, +1 (507) 448-8190.

Is it FDA approved?

No dietary supplement is. The FDA states that it &ldquo;does not have the authority to approve dietary supplements before they are marketed&rdquo;. The registered-facility badge means a factory filed a registration, which is an administrative requirement rather than an inspection result or an endorsement. We never write FDA approved on this site and this label does not either.

Ready to try SodaSlim?

One bottle is 30 capsules at one a day, so a bottle is exactly thirty days and the front of the label says so. The 60-day guarantee runs from purchase, not from delivery, and the price is shown at checkout.

Order NowRead the label firstNo price was published to us. We print no figure we have not seen ourselves. · 60-day guarantee from purchase · Not for under 18, pregnancy or nursing
SodaSlim · 30 capsules658 mg a capsule · 138 mg caffeine · price shown at checkout
Order Now